> The Author who wants to put his changes under a very free license (assuming
> incompatible with GPL) thinks this is not a disservice to the Free Software
> community. But then, he does not colicense it under the GPL. Why? You don't
> give me a good reason for it ("they just don't want to" is no reason for
> me).I have one possible solution. I've been thinking on how I could do that with my code and I'm coming up blank. What would the wording be that will let me license "foobar" under my own, prefered, license *AND* the GPL? -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * =========================================================================
