Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would sooner create YAL that had the GPL's terms matched > with the exception of license compatibility than use a license I KNEW was > going to limit where others could or could not use my code for the > purposes of Free Software. If my code is being used in Free Software, I > don't care what Free Software license they use for their code.
Just curious, how would you phrase a license that did not hinder compatibility yet still prevented someone from modifying the program and releasing it under non-free terms? (We just saw an example of what to fear with BIND: its BSD license allowed modifications under more restrictive licensing conditions, so the upstream maintainers are now putting out the new version under a non-free copyright). -- Henning Makholm
