On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 01:34:58PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > subject says it all, is the OpenContent License DFGS-ok?... now that > I think about it, shouldn't that be OCL? The _text_ of the OPL says > "OpenContent License", not "OpenContent Public License". There was a thread on debian-devel about a half year ago about the OPL. The conclusion was (IIRC) that it was unfinished a we should wait. Someone (I think Gordon Matzigkeit) even explained, that the GPL could be applied to documents too and why this is better than to invent a new license.
David
