Marcelo E. Magallon writes: > A fourth option (which I dislike because it's very treacherous) is to call > the GPL into play. I'm sure that statement is not compatible with the GPL, > is it?
No. However, to use the GPL there must be at least one author who objects to the restriction. > Now my question: doesn't this fall into the same messy kind of problem as > documentation does? Does it have to follow the DFSG point by point? > (Think 'modifications' please) I think it would have to be a separate package for that to apply. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI
