Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously James Troup wrote: > > Oh, good, someone chuck vim in non-free, if it's license hasn't > > changed then. > > Hey, hold on! It so happend I'm currently discussing the vim license > with its author (Bram Moolenaar) at the moment, and I have good hopes of > getting it fixed.
My original bug report on the subject was #14xxx era. How long do we wait before chucking something in non-free? e.g. Should we still be awaiting resolution on the GPL + Qt linked problem? -- James
