Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > People can certainly modify TAO to support any standard they want (in > fact, we're planning on doing this to support a DCOM/CORBA bridge > shortly, as well as a wide variety of protocols other than IIOP 1.0). > As long as it's still possible to ALSO support IIOP 1.0 with the > modified version, then there's no problem wrt the Sun license. If you > want to remove the IIOP support completely, then you'll need to check > with Sun to make sure that's ok.
So, if someone takes TAO code and puts it in a CORBA client, that client must also have all the functionality of the ORB? I still don't understand why this should be a legal issue, if the software is renamed so that it's called something other than TAO. -- Raul
