"Robert Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In the event an intellectual property claim is made or appears likely to be made with respect to the Software, you agree to permit IBM to enable you to continue to use the Software, or to modify it, or replace it with software that is at least functionally equivalent. If IBM determines that none of these alternatives is reasonably available, you agree, at IBM's request, upon notice to you, to discontinue further distribution of the Software and to delete or destroy all copies of the Software you possess. This is IBM's entire obligation to you regarding any claim of infringement.
I take it that this is the paragraph that is causing contention? I don't see any other problems with the license. I'm not sure exactly where this paragraph falls under the DFSG.