Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I disagree with that. Debian is an online organisation and discussion > and decision need to happen online. Noone is prevented to read > debian-legal.
People are heavily discouraged from reading debian-legal because it's full of huge amounts of masturbation. It's not -legal's job to define the standards by which Debian determines freedom - it's legal's job to determine whether a specific license meets those. > I will probably not able to attend debconf 5, but even if I were, > I would not be able to usefully participate to a DFSG session, because > nobody understand me when I speak English and I understand half what > others say. So one way or another, you will not have my input that way. That's unfortunate. However, holding the discussion on -legal guarantees that we won't have the input of many developers. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
