On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:53:29PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I disagree with that. Debian is an online organisation and discussion > > and decision need to happen online. Noone is prevented to read > > debian-legal. > > People are heavily discouraged from reading debian-legal because it's > full of huge amounts of masturbation. It's not -legal's job to define > the standards by which Debian determines freedom - it's legal's job to > determine whether a specific license meets those. > > > I will probably not able to attend debconf 5, but even if I were, > > I would not be able to usefully participate to a DFSG session, because > > nobody understand me when I speak English and I understand half what > > others say. So one way or another, you will not have my input that way. > > That's unfortunate. However, holding the discussion on -legal guarantees > that we won't have the input of many developers.
Sure, we can discuss that on debian-project instead. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
