On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:00:46AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > You're claiming, as far as I can tell, that any license that can be twisted > > in a non-free way is categorically non-free. > > No. > > http://dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20050324.html
You can't just say "no". When you find people don't understand your position, either explain your position more clearly, or stop wasting our time. Anyhow, you've made it blindingly clear that you have nothing of real substance to offer to this list; anything you might have to offer is deafened by your continual snide derision, your complete (and obviously entirely deliberate) inability to discuss anything at all civilly. Even the subject of a certain Drinking Game a while back has a much better track record than you lately. *plonk* -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
