On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:46:14PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:05:16PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > While the GPL defines source as the prefered form for modification, > > > that definition doesn't exist in the DFSG. > > > > There are a lot of things that the DFSG does not define, but we still > > deal with it as best we can. > > By throwing hardware support out the window? Good plan!
Sorry, you've lost me. Don is arguing that the GPL's definition of "source" is the best one we have (and I agree). The GPL's definition of "source" has no obvious relation to "throwing hardware support out the window". What are you talking about? -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
