Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not either. It's a hypothetical. That is, if, hypothetically, the > source provided is the result of a obfuscation regex, then it's not > source. [IE, we aren't provided the real prefered form for > modification.]
While the GPL defines source as the prefered form for modification, that definition doesn't exist in the DFSG. There's no reason to believe that we need the preferred form for modification, merely an acceptable form for modification. Otherwise we run into all sorts of issues with JPEGs and suchlike... -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
