Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:55:13PM -0500, Walter Landry wrote: > > Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > See above. This is really getting quite silly. We have strong reason to > > > believe that the Kaffe folks *do not* interpret the GPL as contaminating > > > things which are run within Kaffe (with the possible exception of things > > > that use JNI calls to accomplish things which are not possible in other > > > JVMs, if any such exist). > > > > Actually, the problem is that we don't. For some of the authors, we > > have that information, but far from all of them. > > Yes, actually, we do - but perhaps not in the way you're thinking. > > *) The FAQ, which one would hope they have all read since it's still up, > and they're still authoring for it, basically says this. > > *) The only participant to date, while only a single author, certainly > strongly affirms it. > > *) Nobody has produced any statement from the contrary from any of them.
This is just a lot of wishful thinking. We might as well distribute all sorts of unlicensed stuff on the internet for exactly the same reasons. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
