In this factual setting, I think it's wisest for everyone to
fall back to trademark statute if the agreement falls apart.
Fair enough. I'm convinced :-)
Replace "the name of the package will have to be changed in all as-yet-unreleased versions of Debian" with "permission to use the trademarks will be withdrawn for all as-yet-unreleased versions of Debian".
That should deal with the issue were MJ felt it was more like a contract than a permissions grant.
Gerv
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
