Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] I'm not planning to develop the instructions document by > interactive trial-and-error with you on debian-legal ;-)
Fine, but at this time it's not easy to build a firefox-based browser that Mozilla Foundation would be happy with, even with reading around, and definitely not in 10 minutes. > [...] But I don't > think completing this process needs to be a requirement for working out > the remaining issues. I agree with this. I do think it's a requirement for going forwards once any compromise is worked out. > > I'm sceptical that > > it will be done quickly, because one still has to hack to get firefox > > builds running on multi-user systems and that's been a critical known > > bug for some time. > So, by simple extrapolation, all important Mozilla bugs take six months > to fix? ;-) It's the Mozilla's project choice to deny unregistered access to the summary bug statistics. What do you expect people to do instead of forming opinions based on similar bugs that they know? That bug is one which primarily impacts Unix-like systems and is pretty severe for distributors, which is a similar profile to our branding one. I know it's not a robust B.L.U.E. statistic, but it's all I've got right now. Making a silly comment is not a very strong argument either. -- MJR/slef -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
