Herbert Fortes writes ("Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1"): > [Ian Jackson:] > > So I think that the situation is perfectly clear. Algorithms are not > > covered by copyright (anywhere). The upstream author is just being > > over-cautious in leaving in that notice. > > Why being "over-[cautious]" if the append is useless. That's the term I > should use at first. It is the upstream choice.
I'm afraid I don't follow. I can't even tell if you're agreeing with me or not. Sorry. Ian.