On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 06:24:31PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote: > On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:47:48AM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote: > >> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Alan Shutko wrote: > >> > Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Perhaps a bit irellevant, but if you really want suspend to disk and > > your kernel/machine combination doesn't support it, there is always > > software-matic s. to disk. Don't know how smooth it works tough > > Can you supply any more details about this "software-matic" suspend to > disk? The only thing I was able to turn up was the Software-Suspend > code, by "Seasons", now maintained by Pavel Machek. > > This, of course, can't be the implementation you are talking about > because you elided my entire post which was almost exclusively > discussing that patch, right? I'm afraid I was enlightened (awake?) enough to miss that I originally found the link somewhere in one of the laptop-howto's, but now I realise it was all about the same
*deeply ashamed* Are there any reasons to prefer software suspend to disk above bios-controlled, or backwards? -- Greetings Joris [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 25569167 PGP is currently out-of-use -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
