Hello, On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 06:17:11PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > I don't think so. Even if ISO 8601 specifies the YYYY-MM-DD format, it > is actually very uncommon in Germany. I cannot remember a single letter > that I received with such a date, everybody uses the DD.MM.YYYY format > which has been used for ages. It may be possible that ISO 8601 is an
well, a magazin I wrote something for recently asked me to switch date in this way; however, this was the first time ever I remember someone asking me to use this format instead of the way more common d.m.yyy one. > attempt to unify date formats in the European Union, but if so it is > <rant> just another act of bureaucracy that institution is so notorious > for. </rant> > > > Before applying the patch, I would like a confirmation from a native > > speaker that the change is correct. > > Please do not apply the patch, but send it to another native speaker: > Ulrich Drepper, the glibc maintainer. If upstream decides that the > German locale should switch to ISO 8601, then Debian should do so as > well; but most German users would probably be unhappy about it. I strongly agree, especially since Ulrich Drepper is a German speaker. I very well remember the uniliteral request of the Debian translation team (I think it was for Sarge) to get proper shell quotes which was rejected by the (glibc, I believe) maintainer because upstream rejected it (or something similar, I never got the entire reasoning straight); so I second the move to remain in sync with upstream. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature