On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 12:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 11:27 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 23:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > [...] > > > You shouldn't need to specify the config files at all. > > > [...] > > > This looks just the same as for armel and armhf... except using Image > > > instead of zImage. Let me see what I can do to clean up these per-arch > > > rules so this duplication isn't needed. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Rebased version attached. > > Looks good to me.
Thanks. I'm not going to push it now since the build-deps cannot be satisfied yet and arm64 is using the existing minimal support for linux-libc-dev, so I don't want to break that. (TBH not sure how that works now, perhaps some build profile stuff I'm not seeing/don't understand). Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1398095723.27649.32.ca...@dagon.hellion.org.uk
