On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 20:50 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: [...] > --- a/linux/debian/config/arm64/defines > +++ b/linux/debian/config/arm64/defines > @@ -1,4 +1,18 @@ > [base] > kernel-arch: arm64 > featuresets: > -# empty; we don't have initramfs working yet > + none > + > +[build] > +debug-info: true > + > +[image] > +configs: > +image-file: arch/arm64/boot/Image > + > +[arm64_description] > +hardware: 64-bit ARMv8 machines > + > +[arm64_image] > +configs: > + arm64/config
You shouldn't need to specify the config files at all. [...] > --- a/linux/debian/rules.real > +++ b/linux/debian/rules.real > @@ -385,6 +385,14 @@ > install-image_$(ARCH)_$(FEATURESET)_$(FLAVOUR)_plain_image: > done > endif > > +install-image_arm64_$(FEATURESET)_$(FLAVOUR)_plain_image: DTB_INSTALL_DIR = > /usr/lib/linux-image-$(REAL_VERSION) > +install-image_arm64_$(FEATURESET)_$(FLAVOUR)_plain_image: > + install -m644 '$(DIR)/arch/$(KERNEL_ARCH)/boot/Image' > $(INSTALL_DIR)/vmlinuz-$(REAL_VERSION) > + +$(MAKE_CLEAN) -C $(DIR) dtbs > + shopt -s nullglob ; for i in $(DIR)/arch/arm64/boot/dts/*.dtb ; do \ > + install -D -m644 $$i > '$(PACKAGE_DIR)'/'$(DTB_INSTALL_DIR)'/$$(basename $$i) ; \ > + done This looks just the same as for armel and armhf... except using Image instead of zImage. Let me see what I can do to clean up these per-arch rules so this duplication isn't needed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Make three consecutive correct guesses and you will be considered an expert.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
