* Andi Kleen | 2014-01-04 19:18:07 [+0100]: >On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:55:48PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> where do I start. Let me explain what is going on here. The code >> sequence > >Yes the IST stacks are needed for correctness, even in more cases than >the example below. You cannot just disable them, just because you don't >like them.
Andi, you were the Author of that patch. I plan to migrate from the IST stack to the kernel stack so I can enable preemption. This is he case on 32bit. You mention more cases than this. Could you please give me some examples so I can consider them? >-Andi Sebastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140106113230.ga25...@linutronix.de
