On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 05:45:47AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 19:18 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:55:48PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > where do I start. Let me explain what is going on here. The code > > > sequence > > > > Yes the IST stacks are needed for correctness, even in more cases than > > the example below. You cannot just disable them, just because you don't > > like them. > > You had a better reason than dislike.
Ah true it was me. Good point. I forgot all about that. Probably it needs some form of the NMI style paranoid_* switch. -Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140105180446.gx20...@two.firstfloor.org
