Simon Guinot <si...@sequanux.org> writes:
Hi, > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:08:06PM +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote: >> Simon Guinot <si...@sequanux.org> writes: >> Hi, >> >> > Package: linux-2.6 >> > Version: 3.1.6-1 >> > Severity: important >> > >> > Dear Maintainer, >> > >> > The kernel image provided by package linux-image-3.1.0-1-kirkwood don't >> > support the LaCie Kirkwood boards. >> > >> > Please, consider applying the following patch: >> > >> > diff --git a/config/armel/config.kirkwood b/config/armel/config.kirkwood >> > index 1eae313..85b0c64 100644 >> > --- a/config/armel/config.kirkwood >> > +++ b/config/armel/config.kirkwood >> > @@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ CONFIG_MACH_DOCKSTAR=y >> > CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_BASE=y >> > CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_CLIENT=y >> > CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_ULTIMATE=y >> > +CONFIG_MACH_NETSPACE_V2=y >> > +CONFIG_MACH_INETSPACE_V2=y >> > +CONFIG_MACH_NETSPACE_MAX_V2=y >> > +CONFIG_MACH_D2NET_V2=y >> > +CONFIG_MACH_NET2BIG_V2=y >> > +CONFIG_MACH_NET5BIG_V2=y >> > CONFIG_MACH_T5325=y >> > >> > ## >> > @@ -172,6 +178,11 @@ CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS=y >> > # CONFIG_DRM is not set >> > >> > ## >> > +## file: drivers/hwmon/Kconfig >> > +## >> > +CONFIG_SENSORS_GPIO_FAN=m >> > + >> > +## >> > ## file: drivers/i2c/Kconfig >> > ## >> > CONFIG_I2C=y >> > @@ -244,6 +255,8 @@ CONFIG_ISDN_DIVAS_MAINT=m >> > CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y >> > CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=y >> > CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO=y >> > +CONFIG_LEDS_NS2=y >> > +CONFIG_LEDS_NETXBIG=y >> > CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=y >> > CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER=y >> > CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON=y >> >> Does this really need to be built-in ? (side note: if it can't work as >> module, why is it a tristate and not a boolean in kernel config ?) > > No it doesn't. I should have configured them as modules. ok. I've enabled the devices in svn for 3.2. > By the way, why is the driver leds-gpio built-in ? > There may be various reason, but I've no idea why. >> >> Also, do you plan to add support for them into d-i (unless it's already >> done) ? > > Note that the having d-i support is not mandatory to run Debian on a > LaCie NAS. Please, let's fix the kernel support. On my side, I will have > a look at the Debian installer as quickly as possible (knowing that I am > quite busy this days). I didn't want to imply that d-i support was needed to enable the devices. I was thinking it would be a nice addition to this change in the kernel package. Thanks, Arnaud -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vcofop6n....@lebrac.rtp-net.org
