> Dave's concerns seemed mainly to be about AGP bits rather than PCI, are
Yeah, his concerns are valid: why touch it if nobody is using it. And if truly there aren't enough folks being interested in AGP support, then I am fine dropping it. > they independent(-ish)? e.g. is only a subset of the .../480 series is The PCI cards I am taking about are the .. PCI Matrox G400 or like, so even older than AGP cards. > needed to enable PCI support? You know, I might have not actually posted a patch for this. It was one of those DRM scattergather code. <shrugs> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101207171848.ga5...@dumpdata.com
