On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 12:56 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:41:57AM +0100, Alexander Kurtz wrote: > > > The following bugs seem to be identical: > > > #601341 > > #602418 > > #604096 > > > They all seem to be fixed by this kernel: > > http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/ > > > I think it would be a good idea to > > *) merge them all > > *) assign to linux-2.6 > > *) mark as affecting xserver-xorg > > *) mark as patched > > *) possibly mark them as RC > > That's all fine by me (as reporter of #601341 and #602418). > > Possibly the patch tag is not adequate as the exact > read-to-apply-to-the-Debian-package patch is not there, just "one of > the differences between the Debian package and > http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/ fixes this".
Ian, can you identify which patch we're currently missing? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
