On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 08:26:01PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:49:57PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 20:49 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > > Package: linux-2.6 > > > Version: 2.6.32-10 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > see in git ubuntu lucid > > > git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git > > > git shortlog 5f78f17a5b5518120eaa28021e76a267a3ad27d0.. -- drivers/net/igb > > > depends also on followup fix 97a21d3ae6477ef00e39f21e47ce767a8ca1a22a > > > x86: Avoid race condition in pci_enable_msix() > > > > > > > > > seems worthwile to debian too, anyone against adding that backport? > > > > I have no specific objection. However, I thought that as a general rule > > we cherry-pick fixes and new hardware support rather than completely > > updating drivers. I'm aware that we've broken that rule for sfc and for > > DRM, but in those cases we have a commitment from upstream to support > > the backport. Can we get that for igb? > > Maks, what's the status?
no time currently to clear upstream status. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100524032229.gc19...@baikonur.stro.at
