On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:49:57PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 20:49 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.32-10
> > Severity: important
> >
> > see in git ubuntu lucid
> > git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git
> > git shortlog 5f78f17a5b5518120eaa28021e76a267a3ad27d0.. -- drivers/net/igb
> > depends also on followup fix 97a21d3ae6477ef00e39f21e47ce767a8ca1a22a
> > x86: Avoid race condition in pci_enable_msix()
> >
> >
> > seems worthwile to debian too, anyone against adding that backport?
>
> I have no specific objection. However, I thought that as a general rule
> we cherry-pick fixes and new hardware support rather than completely
> updating drivers. I'm aware that we've broken that rule for sfc and for
> DRM, but in those cases we have a commitment from upstream to support
> the backport. Can we get that for igb?
Maks, what's the status?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100522182601.ga32...@galadriel.inutil.org
