On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:54 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk): > > > > > It may be pedantic, but the reason why most firmware are not available > > > > is because they do not conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines: > > > > they might be open source with a non compatible license. > > > > > > > > Anyway, I don't know for sure for the Linux kernel : all the non free > > > > firmware may also be closed source. > > > > Indeed, we do not have source code for any of the non-free firmware. In > > many cases it is under a BSDish licence and would thus become DFSG-free > > if the source code was released. > > > Can you comment (maybe later) on David's proposal so that I can decide > whether to include that paragraph in the reviewed templates.
I am happy with David's version, if you do not think it will be too much trouble for translators who have already started. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
