On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 05:00:25PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > retitle 550990 IPv6 is broken on arm > thanks > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:34:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 14:03 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > reopen 550990 > > > thanks > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 07:28:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > No, IPv6 is not broken. At least, not by the kernel. > > > > > > > > This is probably a bug in glibc or openssh. > > > > > > Please don't close bugs outright if you believe they're only misfiled. > > > The bug is there; if you claim that it is not a kernel bug, then that's > > > fine, but that doesn't mean you should assert it does not exist. > > > > Wouter, you're quite capable of investigating bugs and writing a > > descriptive title. Don't act like a luser. > > [...] > > > Now I'm definitely willing to do some more investigation in order to > > > pinpoint the right package to reassign this bug to, but please don't > > > just tell me outright that it's not a bug again next time. > > > > You said "IPv6 is broken" and I correctly said "IPv6 is not broken". > > It is, on the machine I was running it on. Please.
Is it a Thecus N2100? IPv6 is far more dependent on multicast than IPv4, and multicast configuration is broken on one version of the N2100. This is a bug in a specific driver (or possibly the hardware): #488495. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The most exhausting thing in life is being insincere. - Anne Morrow Lindberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
