retitle 550990 IPv6 is broken on arm thanks On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:34:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 14:03 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > reopen 550990 > > thanks > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 07:28:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > No, IPv6 is not broken. At least, not by the kernel. > > > > > > This is probably a bug in glibc or openssh. > > > > Please don't close bugs outright if you believe they're only misfiled. > > The bug is there; if you claim that it is not a kernel bug, then that's > > fine, but that doesn't mean you should assert it does not exist. > > Wouter, you're quite capable of investigating bugs and writing a > descriptive title. Don't act like a luser. > [...] > > Now I'm definitely willing to do some more investigation in order to > > pinpoint the right package to reassign this bug to, but please don't > > just tell me outright that it's not a bug again next time. > > You said "IPv6 is broken" and I correctly said "IPv6 is not broken".
It is, on the machine I was running it on. Please. -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
