On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:46:13PM +0100, Berni Elbourn wrote: > dann frazier wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:14:07AM +0100, Berni Elbourn wrote: >>> Linux sv28 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Mar 27 04:02:59 UTC 2009 x86_64 >>> GNU/Linux >> >> Please include the output of /proc/version, it is difficult to map >> this back to an actual kernel version. But.. it looks like you might >> be running something before 2.6.26-16, whcich was built on Jun 10? > > Dann, A huge thanks for this and all the other work you do for Debian! > > The 2.6.26-2 above is the current Lenny kernel from the official > security repository.
2.6.26-2 is not the version, it is the ABI name: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelABIChanges > cat /proc/version > Linux version 2.6.26-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.26-15) (da...@debian.org) (gcc > version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Fri Mar 27 > 04:02:59 UTC 2009 Yes, this is an out-of-date version of the 2.6.26-2-amd64 image. Current is 2.6.26-17lenny1 (you have 2.6.26-15). > Disks are: > > cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [raid1] > md2 : active raid1 sda3[0] sdc3[2](S) sdb3[1] > 464945088 blocks [2/2] [UU] > [=============>.......] check = 65.4% (304258176/464945088) > finish=36.8min speed=72672K/sec > > md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdc2[2](S) sdb2[1] > 7815552 blocks [2/2] [UU] > resync=DELAYED > > md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdc1[2](S) sdb1[1] > 15623104 blocks [2/2] [UU] > > unused devices: <none> It is likely that this was fixed in 2.6.26-16. > I am now poised to install a kernel from lenny backports alternatively I > could wait for 2.6.26-16 to arrive in Lenny - when would that be please? 2009.06.10 according to: http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.html > Once again a big thanks for all your work, > > Berni > > > > -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
