On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:12:08PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Sven Luther wrote: > > >So, directly using make-kpkg as was the recomended way until now is no more > >supported ? > > Recommended by whom? :-) I did not explore the issue in detail, but we
By Manoj :), as well as dh_make -k too. > have a *lot* of modules packaged with module-assistant in the archive > already. If that way was compatible with make-kpkg before, then it will > remain that way. Ok. I think it is important that dh_make -k produce a skeleton of working module package, in order to make new p&ackaging of modules easy. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
