#include <hallo.h> * Manoj Srivastava [Sat, Apr 08 2006, 09:14:14AM]: > On 6 Apr 2006, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > #include <hallo.h> > > * Sven Luther [Thu, Apr 06 2006, 08:09:46AM]: > >> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:12:08PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: > >>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Sven Luther wrote: > >>> > >>>> So, directly using make-kpkg as was the recomended way until now > >>>> is no more supported ? > >>> > >>> Recommended by whom? :-) I did not explore the issue in detail, > >>> but we > >> > >> By Manoj :), as well as dh_make -k too. > > > > make-kpkg or m-a, that does not matter, they basically use the same > > command line interface introduced by Manoj and slightly refined. > > What was the slight refinement?
Let's see... KPKG_DEST_DIR was the first one, we have discussed that years ago and it was accepted well AFAICS. And there are additional targets that m-a-infected rules file provide, used to predict the file location and debug the build environment. OTOH some things are not implemented, and nobody has asked for them: KPKG_EXTRAV_ARG, CONCURRENCY_LEVEL, ROOT_CMD, UNSIGN_CHANGELOG, UNSIGN_SOURCE, APPEND_TO_VERSION, INT_SUBARCH. The last thing is interesting - I don't exactly know how to deal with crosscompilation. Maybe you have a hint how to reliably establish the the correct environment to build modules consistent with what the user wants to do. Eduard. -- <Rhonda> Ah! <Rhonda> bootsplash != bootsplash <Rhonda> Sag das doch gleich. <mr_claus> das sind zwei getrennte dinge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
