Control: reassign -1 src:linux 6.18.15-1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 11:01:08AM +0000, Andrea V wrote:
> Source: linux-signed-amd64
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
> 
> Subject: linux-image-6.18.15+deb13-amd64: suspend via s2idle fails to reach 
> S0i3 on ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 AMD, while 6.12.74 works
> 
> Package: linux-image-6.18.15+deb13-amd64
> Version: 6.18.15-1~bpo13+1
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
> 
> Dear Debian Kernel Team,
> 
> I am reporting what appears to be a suspend regression in the Debian backports
> kernel on a Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 AMD (type 21F8CTO1WW).
> 
> Summary
> -------
> On linux-image-6.18.15+deb13-amd64 (6.18.15-1~bpo13+1), suspend enters s2idle
> but fails to reach S0i3 / deep low-power idle. The laptop "suspends", but the
> fan keeps running and power draw remains high.
> 
> On the same machine, the Debian security kernel
> linux-image-6.12.74+deb13+1-amd64 (6.12.74-2) works correctly: s2idle reaches
> S0i3 successfully and the machine suspends properly.
> 
> System
> ------
> - Model: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 AMD (21F8CTO1WW)
> - CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
> - BIOS before testing: 1.25
> - BIOS updated during debugging via fwupd to: 1.29
> - mem_sleep: [s2idle]
> - The platform exposes S0/S4/S5 only; no "deep"/S3 is available
> 
> Regression comparison
> ---------------------
> Working kernel:
> - linux-image-6.12.74+deb13+1-amd64
> - version 6.12.74-2
> 
> Failing kernel:
> - linux-image-6.18.15+deb13-amd64
> - version 6.18.15-1~bpo13+1
> 
> Both kernels were tested on the same machine and firmware.
> 
> Behavior on failing kernel (6.18.15-1~bpo13+1)
> -----------------------------------------------
> Relevant journal excerpts from the failing boot:
> 
>   Linux version 6.18.15+deb13-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 
> 6.18.15-1~bpo13+1
>   ACPI: PM: (supports S0 S4 S5)
>   Low-power S0 idle used by default for system suspend
>   systemd-sleep: Performing sleep operation 'suspend'...
>   PM: suspend entry (s2idle)
>   amd_pmc AMDI0009:00: Last suspend didn't reach deepest state
>   systemd-sleep: System returned from sleep operation 'suspend'
>   PM: suspend exit
> 
> During testing on 6.18, AMD PMC debugfs showed:
> - S0ix Residency Time: 0
> - Last S0i3 Status: Unknown/Fail
> 
> Observed user-visible effect:
> - laptop appears suspended
> - but fan keeps spinning
> - opening the lid resumes the machine
> 
> Behavior on working kernel (6.12.74-2)
> --------------------------------------
> On 6.12.74+deb13+1-amd64, the same machine suspends correctly.
> 
> AMD PMC debugfs on the working 6.12 kernel reports:
> - Last S0i3 Status: Success
> - Time in S0i3: 9852905 us
> - Residency Time: 9852905
> 
> This strongly suggests a regression between the two Debian kernel versions.
> 
> What was already tested
> -----------------------
> - BIOS updated from 1.25 to 1.29: no fix for 6.18 behavior
> - acpi.ec_no_wakeup=1: no fix for 6.18 behavior
> - Suspend tested with and without USB-C dock attached
> - Suspend tested with dock-side USB/Thunderbolt wake settings adjusted
> - The separate lid-close/logind issue was fixed independently and is unrelated
> 
> Potentially relevant hardware path
> ----------------------------------
> This platform includes AMD Pink Sardine USB4/Thunderbolt controllers:
> - 0000:c5:00.5
> - 0000:c5:00.6
> 
> While debugging 6.18, amd_pmc debug output suggested USB4 activity remained
> significant when suspend failed, but the regression remains reproducible even
> after disconnecting the dock.
> 
> Installed package versions
> --------------------------
> - linux-image-6.18.15+deb13-amd64: 6.18.15-1~bpo13+1
> - linux-image-6.12.74+deb13+1-amd64: 6.12.74-2
> - amd64-microcode: 3.20250311.1
> - firmware-linux / firmware-linux-nonfree: 20260110-1~bpo13+1
> 
> If needed, I can provide additional logs, but the key point is:
> - 6.18 backports fails to reach S0i3 on suspend
> - 6.12 on the same machine succeeds

As we won't provide more updates to kernels with the 6.18 series, and
moved to 6.19 (with a bpo upload pending as well yet), can you confirm
if the issue persists with 6.19.8-1 from unstable?

Regards,
Salvatore

Reply via email to