Hi Cyril, Steve, On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 07:51:40AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> (2024-09-03): > > Right, this is sensible. We have currently the FTBFS for 6.10.7-1 for > > riscv64 and arm64 which needs to be sorted. We either can have this > > fixed isolated or do a 6.10.8-1 with the build failure fixes? Is this > > near enough timewise? > > I don't have any preferences regarding a future wholesale 6.10.y or just > a new revision of the current upstream release. It'd probably just make > sense to avoid upgrading to 6.11.y since I'd guess we would get more > things to look at.
Yes, 6.11.y won't go to unstable anyway before 6.11 is released. So that will take still some weeks. That means for unstable we will continue following the 6.10.y series for now. In any case Aurelien worked on the FTBFS issue: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1185 So we would be able to have either 6.10.7-2 or 6.10.8-1 at your preference. Aiming though to make 6.11.y and once ready 6.12.y go timely to unstable as the later one is expected/likely the expected LTS version. > I'll let Steve comment on the preferred timings. Ack! Regards, Salvatore
