Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> (2024-09-03): > Right, this is sensible. We have currently the FTBFS for 6.10.7-1 for > riscv64 and arm64 which needs to be sorted. We either can have this > fixed isolated or do a 6.10.8-1 with the build failure fixes? Is this > near enough timewise?
I don't have any preferences regarding a future wholesale 6.10.y or just a new revision of the current upstream release. It'd probably just make sense to avoid upgrading to 6.11.y since I'd guess we would get more things to look at. I'll let Steve comment on the preferred timings. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
