On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 03:33:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:56:39AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Indeed. The idea was to move 2.6.14 to sid, and make the out-of-git tree the > > main development tree, which was exactly what *YOU* where advocating post > > 2.6.12, so i don't understand what you are complaining about. > > I advocated using trunk/linux-2.6 for such development. This is > something different then removing the directory.
Well, i guess it was a mistake, since it was renamedto trunk/linux-2.6-git. > > Bastian what do you think about my idea of splitting infrastructure and > > per-version stuff ? I would hearthily like to hear your comments on that. > > I have some concerns about it. Including that it makes the probability > to break much higher. Any idea of the kind of breakage you expect ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
