On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:56:39AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Indeed. The idea was to move 2.6.14 to sid, and make the out-of-git tree the > main development tree, which was exactly what *YOU* where advocating post > 2.6.12, so i don't understand what you are complaining about.
I advocated using trunk/linux-2.6 for such development. This is something different then removing the directory. > Bastian what do you think about my idea of splitting infrastructure and > per-version stuff ? I would hearthily like to hear your comments on that. I have some concerns about it. Including that it makes the probability to break much higher. Bastian -- Spock: The odds of surviving another attack are 13562190123 to 1, Captain.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
