On Friday, July 07, 2017 05:34:09 PM Ben Hutchings wrote: > On 7 July 2017 15:16:02 BST, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: > >On Friday, July 07, 2017 02:43:03 PM Rhonda D'Vine wrote: > >> Hey Ben, > >> > >> * Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> [2017-07-07 13:49:12 CEST]: > >> > On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 11:19 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > >> > > Version check failed: > >> > > Your upload included the binary package linux-source-4.9, version > >> > > 4.9.30-2+deb9u2~bpo8+1, for all, > >> > > however unstable already has version 4.9.30-2. > >> > > >> > For fuck's sake, decruft it! > >> > > >> > This has been blocking kernel security updates to jessie-backports > > > >for > > > >> > over 2 weeks. > >> > >> I'm terribly sorry about that I missed going over the cruft report > > > >for > > > >> such long, I take the responsibility for that. > > Thank you, but I wasn't complaining to you. > > >> It should be all done > >> now, the cruft reports are empty from what I can tell: > >> > >> rhonda@fasolo:~$ dak cruft-report -s jessie-backports > >> rhonda@fasolo:~$ > >> > >> The message that you receive though points in a different direction > >> > >> than cruft report: proposed-updates contain a version higher than > > > >what > > > >> we have in unstable. I think that automatic blocking of versions > > > >higher > > > >> than what we have in unstable is intentional in place. > > I understood and agree with that. > > >> Why was a > >> version higher than what we have in unstable accepted? > > Because the security archive doesn't have such a restriction. > > >> Will it get > >> removed from unstable, and if so, when? > >> > >> Ansgar, do you maybe know how we can force that in for now? Or why > >> > >> linux-source-4.9 is still sitting in unstable, it is not in testing > >> though. > > > >* package linux-source-4.9 in version 4.9.30-2 is no longer built from > >source > > Exactly - it's unstable that needs decrufting, which I have previously (and > more politely) requested. > > - suggested command: > >dak rm -m "[auto-cruft] no longer built from source" -s unstable -a all > >-p > >-R -b linux-source-4.9 > > > > - broken Build-Depends: > > user-mode-linux: linux-source-4.9 > > Aargh. > > >We're in the middle of dinstall, so I can't remove it now. If I > >remember, > >I'll go ahead and remove it later today (and uml will have to figure > >something > >else out). > > Thank you. user-mode-linux really should be removed or folded into > src:linux.
Marked for removal. Should be gone after the next dinstall. Good luck on uml. Scott K
