On Friday, July 07, 2017 02:43:03 PM Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> Hey Ben,
>
> * Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> [2017-07-07 13:49:12 CEST]:
> > On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 11:19 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> > > Version check failed:
> > > Your upload included the binary package linux-source-4.9, version
> > > 4.9.30-2+deb9u2~bpo8+1, for all,
> > > however unstable already has version 4.9.30-2.
> >
> > For fuck's sake, decruft it!
> >
> > This has been blocking kernel security updates to jessie-backports for
> > over 2 weeks.
>
> I'm terribly sorry about that I missed going over the cruft report for
> such long, I take the responsibility for that. It should be all done
> now, the cruft reports are empty from what I can tell:
>
> rhonda@fasolo:~$ dak cruft-report -s jessie-backports
> rhonda@fasolo:~$
>
> The message that you receive though points in a different direction
> than cruft report: proposed-updates contain a version higher than what
> we have in unstable. I think that automatic blocking of versions higher
> than what we have in unstable is intentional in place. Why was a
> version higher than what we have in unstable accepted? Will it get
> removed from unstable, and if so, when?
>
> Ansgar, do you maybe know how we can force that in for now? Or why
> linux-source-4.9 is still sitting in unstable, it is not in testing
> though.
* package linux-source-4.9 in version 4.9.30-2 is no longer built from source
- suggested command:
dak rm -m "[auto-cruft] no longer built from source" -s unstable -a all -p
-R -b linux-source-4.9
- broken Build-Depends:
user-mode-linux: linux-source-4.9
We're in the middle of dinstall, so I can't remove it now. If I remember,
I'll go ahead and remove it later today (and uml will have to figure something
else out).
Scott K
