-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi there.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 11:30:25AM +0900, Horms wrote: > The problem that you see is a patch that was included in 2.4.27-11 > (the current version in sid), though it isn't built for amd64. > > Could you see if the following patch works for you. Yes it does. That's exactly what I also did to make it build, but I didn't send in a patch as I wasn't sure that 4 (sizeof(u32)) is the right factor for a 64-bit arch. > I've CCed lkml and Marcelo for their consideration. It seems to me > that 2.4 is indeed vulnerable to CAN-2005-0204, perhaps someone can > shed some light on this. My intuition agrees with yours. However, as also stated in #329355 by fs, "the amd64 port does not support 2.4 kernels, and there are no plans to change this", so I guess this is not-a-bug for debian/x86_64. \n\n -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Nikos "Nikolai" Ntarmos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> iD8DBQFDMrgIm6J1ac+VFgoRAhbeAKCF2R6VkcHCsTYalKNnuvZeILlfMwCeMQDu 0C9BehFcgeBdor2abF+2wmo= =Ihfo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
