On 9/24/05, Siddha, Suresh B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:55:41AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > On 9/24/05, Siddha, Suresh B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > set_tssldt_descriptor(&cpu_gdt_table[cpu][GDT_ENTRY_TSS], > > > (unsigned long)addr, > > > DESC_TSS, > > > - sizeof(struct tss_struct) - 1); > > > + IO_BITMAP_OFFSET + IO_BITMAP_BYTES + 7); > > > } > > > > > [snip] > > > > Is it just me, or would it be nice with a symbolic name for this "7" ? > > For someone reading the code for the first time it seems to me that > > it's non-obvious why the 7 is there, and why it's 7 exactely - a > > define would make it clearer as I see it. > > Andrew please apply this updated patch. Thanks. > [snip]
That change makes me happy :) -- Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
