On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: [snip]
> > I suggest that we just track this as 323183, rather than mucking around > > with opening and merging existing bugs. Please let me know if you would > > prefer a different approach. > > No, that is fine. Having just one report makes things easiest -- though the > most important thing is a clear overview of which sourcepackages are really > ready to be removed and which are not yet -- an overview which you've > succeeded quite well to produce. Thanks, hopefully we can get to the bottom of this sooner rather than later [snip] Matt Zimmerman, the maintainer, has indicated that he is not interested in updating uml to 2.6, which in his oppinion is the only way forward. I guess the package should be orphaned or removed from the archive. But in any case it seems that it shouldn't block the removal of kernel-source-2.4.26. I have CCed Matt so he can clarify this. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323183;msg=25 With regards to pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-i386. I notice that pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-i386 exists and presumably works. I've CCed the maintainer, Per Olofsson for comment. > > kernel-image-2.6.11-alpha > > kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64 > > kernel-image-2.6.11-i386 > > kernel-image-2.6.11-ia64 > > All gone already ttbomk. > > > kernel-patch-2.6.10-hppa > > Still around, ok. > > > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 > > Ditto -- shouldn't this one be simply superseded by packages generated by a > next upload of linux-2.6? amd64 still doesn't seem to exist for linux-2.6, I'm not sure why, perhaps I am just blind or looking in the wrong place http://ftp2.jp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ However, once it is uploaded, it will have binary packages with the same names as those previously produced by the kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 source package. Does this mean that kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 will automatically be removed, or automatically flagged for removal? > > fai-kernels (request from Holger Levsen) > > > > mol-modules-2.6.11 > > Ok. > > After you clarified my two minor questions, could you please reassign this bug > back to ftp.debian.org? I'll then remove all packages mentioned from "Ready > for removal by ftpmasters" up until here. You can then open a new bug for the > packages mentioned below when the time is there. [snip] I'll wait for some feedback from Matt and Per and do just that. Could you clarify the sistuation with regards to kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 being removed once linux-2.6 for amd64 is uploaded. Thanks -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
