On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:19:37AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > (...) > Thanks, hopefully we can get to the bottom of this sooner rather > than later
I hope so too :) > With regards to pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-i386. > I notice that pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-i386 exists and presumably works. > I've CCed the maintainer, Per Olofsson for comment. Ok, either way, since 2.4.27 exists, I won't let pcmcia-modules-2.4.26 block removal. > > > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 > > > > Ditto -- shouldn't this one be simply superseded by packages generated by a > > next upload of linux-2.6? > > amd64 still doesn't seem to exist for linux-2.6, I'm not sure why, > perhaps I am just blind or looking in the wrong place > > http://ftp2.jp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ > > However, once it is uploaded, it will have binary packages with > the same names as those previously produced by the > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 source package. Does this mean that > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 will automatically be removed, or automatically > flagged for removal? Yes, if all binary packages of a give source package are 'hijacked' by another package, the source package will be automatically flagged for removal, and packages automatically flagged for removal will be removed by an ftp-team member every few days. So, no action needed, and not removing will ensure a smooth transition. > Thanks Thanks you, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
