Hi, Sven Luther writes:
> So, i still don't understand what is broken. Consider a patch that creates a single file containing a single line: +foo You publish this as the first revision, resulting in the patchset: patch-1: +foo You realize you should have applied a different patch: +bar So you want to publish a second revision containing the patchset: patch-1: +foo patch-2: -foo +bar If you just replace the patch, you will break the path between the first and the second revision, because you get: patch-1: +bar patch-2: +bar Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!