Your message dated 16 Oct 2004 21:11:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line How can editing a binary kernel be suggested?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2004 21:16:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 04 14:16:00 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from genarin.hispalinux.es [193.127.103.90]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CEaBc-0004Ms-00; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 14:16:00 -0700
Received: by genarin.hispalinux.es (Postfix, from userid 1019)
id B936F10D59E; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:16:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:16:02 +0200
From: Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: kernel-patch-powerpc: How can editing a binary kernel be suggested?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-patch-powerpc
Version: N/A; reported 2004-10-04
Severity: normal
How can this be suggested on an official packaged kernel?
* To change the built-in command line on a PReP system, run mkvmlinuz
and then open the vmlinuz file with a binary editor (emacs is fine).
Locate the default command line and change it to your liking.
However, make sure you preserve the exact length and don't change
anything else, after all you are editing a binary!
Asking an end user to binary-edit a kernel is mindless, from my point of view.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux genarin 2.4.26 #1 Thu Apr 15 17:45:21 CEST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=en_US
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.27|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
It's sex! Sex is the game! Marriage is the penalty.
--Andrew Wyke (Sleuth)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 274939-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2004 19:11:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 16 12:11:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CIty6-0003uQ-00; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:11:55 -0700
Received: from mail.m-online.net (mail.m-online.net [192.168.3.144])
by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D1A517
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:11:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fehwiesenstrasse.dyndns.org (ppp-82-135-12-227.mnet-online.de
[82.135.12.227])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B0B143F55
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:11:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sleipnir.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de
(sleipnir.fehwiesenstrasse.loc [192.168.75.2])
by fehwiesenstrasse.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B5F710
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:11:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by sleipnir.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix, from userid 666)
id 6F406145520; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:11:52 +0200 (CEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How can editing a binary kernel be suggested?
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Lehrstuhl fuer vergleichende Astrozoologie
X-Mahlzeit: Das ist per Saldo Gemuetlichkeit
Reply-To: Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16 Oct 2004 21:11:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
I haven't heard from the original submitter again, despite my effort
to contact him. Therefore, I assume his question has been dealt with
elsewhere, and this bug report can be closed.
Regards, Jens.
--=20
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je p=E9zqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!
