Am Mittwoch, 23. April 2014, 16:51:09 schrieb Alan Ezust: > Baloo is really trouble, at least in its current form. It made my > upgrade/restore process (and every other process that I spawned after that) > take a lot longer until I figured out how to disable it. > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333655 > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331932
Well, after fixing a long standing performance bug in Akonadi maildir resource with the help of Sergio and David[1], I took also compiled all the rest of kdepim and also Baloo, and I say: I am impressed. It indexed files and PIM data so fast I couldn´t even believe it. I don´t know yet whether the index is complete, maybe some files are missing since I stopped the file indexer manually once... but it finds mails, it finds files… and that as well blazingly fast. Now this machine isn´t basically slow with its Dual SSD BTRFS RAID-1, yet… its nice. Some people indeed report performance troubles, but that may at least partly related to reindexing often changing files. So I bet there are still issues, but for me flies circles around Nepomuk. *Easily*. [1] [Akonadi] [Bug 334218] New: synchronizations of large folders with filesystem contents hogs a Sandybridge core for minutes https://bugs.kde.org/334218 [2] [Bug 333655] Baloo indexing I/O introduces serious noticable delays https://bugs.kde.org/333655 Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/3352821.eGXDhQK6NU@merkaba
