Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012 schrieb Modestas Vainius: > Hello, Hi Modestas,
> On 2012 m. of March 15 d., Thursday 12:42:17 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela: > > > On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it > > > > if you value your data. > > > > > > I officially disagree. > > > > Hmmm. I never did test it. > > > > From what I read on kdepim and kdepim-users mailing lists there have > > been quite some users having had severe issues with it. There may be > > quite some users not having issues and these may be less vocal about > > it tough. > > > > Anyway I read that KDE developers fixed lots and lots of bugs have > > for KDEPIM 4.8 and 4.8.1 and are still being fixed. And did quite > > some performance improvements. > > > > Thus from what said I suggest not to use the older KDEPIM 4.7.x, but > > instead KDEPIM 4.8.1 or (preferably) 4.8.2 when its out or even > > 4.8.3 or later. I do hope that later 4.8.x versions of KDEPIM will > > be suitable for production use and I wonder what the plans on > > official KDEPIM 2 packages for Debian are. > > FWIW, I was referring to kdepim 4.7, not *4.8*. Yes, I know. I didn´t want to hint at something else. > In fact, we will > probably upload kdepim 4.8.x together with KDE SC 4.8.x. But that's > for future. > > I said it was crap because I actually lost mails with kdepim 4.7 when I > tried it. Well thats exactly what I like to avoid ;). Thanks for clarifying, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201203151429.49691.mar...@lichtvoll.de
