Hello, On 2012 m. of March 15 d., Thursday 12:42:17 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela: > > On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it > > > if you value your data. > > > > I officially disagree. > > Hmmm. I never did test it. > > From what I read on kdepim and kdepim-users mailing lists there have been > quite some users having had severe issues with it. There may be quite some > users not having issues and these may be less vocal about it tough. > > Anyway I read that KDE developers fixed lots and lots of bugs have for > KDEPIM 4.8 and 4.8.1 and are still being fixed. And did quite some > performance improvements. > > Thus from what said I suggest not to use the older KDEPIM 4.7.x, but > instead KDEPIM 4.8.1 or (preferably) 4.8.2 when its out or even 4.8.3 or > later. I do hope that later 4.8.x versions of KDEPIM will be suitable for > production use and I wonder what the plans on official KDEPIM 2 packages > for Debian are.
FWIW, I was referring to kdepim 4.7, not *4.8*. In fact, we will probably upload kdepim 4.8.x together with KDE SC 4.8.x. But that's for future. I said it was crap because I actually lost mails with kdepim 4.7 when I tried it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201203151407.11425.mo...@debian.org
