Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > On Wednesday 28 September 2005 18:31, Nick Leverton wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 06:26:29PM +0200, Rigo Wenning wrote: >> > Thanks a lot, will do too, >> > >> > but it remains that I need allies in convincing KMail developers to use >> > their index only for caching and not for valid information. > > He? MBox is just the text of all messages concatenated together. Are you > sure that other MUAs store the message status in there? Unless I'm > mistaken, the mbox format doesn't support this.
It could be stored as an X- header in the message - but kmail can hardly be blamed if somebody else uses a completely non-standard way to mark status. -- derek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
